Letters September 23 2026

Could the ‘Theory of Constraints’ help Jamaica improve productivity?

1 min read

Loading article...

THE EDITOR, Madam:

Jamaica is having an important national conversation about productivity. But perhaps one of the questions we should also be asking is: What practical tools can organisations use to improve it?

Recently, I was invited by TOC for Education Inc to represent Jamaica at an international conference in Florida. Representatives attended from countries including Singapore, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, Poland, the Philippines, Mexico, and Colombia. During that experience, I gained a deeper understanding of an approach that I believe deserves serious consideration in Jamaica: the Theory of Constraints (TOC).

The idea is surprisingly simple. Every organisation or system has something that limits its ability to achieve better results, a constraint or bottleneck. The mistake many organisations make is trying to improve everything at the same time. TOC takes a different approach: identify the constraint, focus on it, improve it, measure the result, and then identify the next constraint.

Consider a business where 10 employees are working extremely hard but every customer order must pass through one process that can handle only half the demand. Making the other areas work harder will not necessarily increase output. The bottleneck still determines how much the entire system can produce.

This thinking can be applied to manufacturing, project management, service delivery, education, healthcare, and government operations. Too often, productivity becomes a conversation about people needing to work harder. But sometimes the problem is not effort. Good employees may be operating within poorly designed systems. The constraint may be an approval process, inadequate equipment, poor workflow, delayed decision-making, or a policy that unintentionally slows everything else down.

If we identify the real constraint, organisations can focus their limited resources where improvements will have the greatest impact. Rather than launching a massive national programme, we could start small by selecting several Jamaican organisations, establishing baseline productivity measures, identifying their key constraints, applying targeted interventions, and tracking the results.

Jamaica does not lack talented people. Our challenge is ensuring that people operate within systems that allow their talent, effort, and resources to produce the greatest possible results. As we continue the national conversation on productivity, the Theory of Constraints deserves a place at the table. Before asking Jamaicans simply to work harder, perhaps we should ask: What is preventing the system from working better? That may be one of the most important productivity questions we can ask.

Anisa Wilson-Smith