Is Jamaica ready to govern AI?

THE EDITOR, Madam:

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly transforms security systems Jamaica faces an important question: Are we prepared to govern AI surveillance before we deploy it?

AI-powered surveillance technologies can assist with threat detection, crowd management, critical infrastructure protection, border security, and incident response. Used responsibly, these systems can enhance public safety and support faster, more informed decision-making. However, technology alone does not guarantee security. Without appropriate oversight, accountability, and safeguards, the same tools that protect citizens can also undermine privacy, civil liberties, and public trust.

Jamaica recorded approximately 49 million cyberattack attempts in 2025, with millions more detected so far this year. Although most attacks were successfully blocked, several local organizations have experienced breaches, highlighting the increasingly complex threat landscape. At the same time, cybersecurity experts estimate a global shortage of nearly 4.8 million professionals, raising concerns about whether sufficient expertise exists to manage advanced AI-driven systems securely, ethically, and effectively. As organizations collect and process increasing volumes of data through interconnected technologies, the governance and protection of that information become just as important as the technologies themselves.

The country has already invested in technology-driven border security initiatives, including automated airport kiosks, facial-recognition capabilities within border control systems, advanced cargo screening technologies, and data-driven customs operations. However, it is important to ensure that governance frameworks, oversight mechanisms, and safeguards evolve at the same pace as the technology itself.

In the United Kingdom, the use of live facial-recognition technology by law enforcement agencies has generated legal challenges and public debate.

While Jamaica’s Data Protection Act provides an important foundation for protecting personal information, policymakers must determine whether additional guidance may be required to address the unique challenges posed by AI-driven surveillance technologies.

Effective security requires public confidence, and public confidence depends on transparency, clear rules, independent oversight, and responsible use of technology. AI should complement human judgment, not replace it.

By establishing robust governance frameworks, investing in cybersecurity capacity, and engaging citizens in meaningful dialogue, Jamaica can harness the benefits of AI while protecting fundamental rights and freedoms.

Technology may be advancing rapidly, but governance must keep pace. If Jamaica is to embrace AI-powered surveillance, are we equally prepared to protect the rights, freedoms, and public trust that must accompany it?

RENÉE WATKIS